Regards remote viewing, James Randi is a fraud. I have thoroughly researched the research on remote viewing. I learned a specific RV protocol called ARV (Associative Remote Viewing). Any body can take the freely offered self-study course and learn it in a day — probably less. It’s the easiest of the many RV protocols/methods to do.
I have done 3400+ ARV trials. Each trial I attempted to predict what picture I would be looking at at a specific time in the future. For example, I would predict I would be looking at a man in a sombrero at 10:20am on Tuesday.
AFTER, I did the trial/session and before the time to look at the picture the picture would be randomly selected from a database of 6500 pictures. Out of 3400 trials probability of statics (read, probability of chance) simply does not allow for my nailing the target picture one in every 42 trials. Yet that’s my results. I nailed the target picture 84 times.
Self-study course at remote-viewing.com
Greg Kolodziejzyk, the founder of the site, has had similar results and so have many people that have gone through the course. He gives many examples/success they’ve achieved.
Kudos to the author of the above article. My own personal experience and research done by others screams out that James Randi is a fraud regards RV.
Pingback: Vilka drivkrafter finns bakom olika typer av skeptiker? « S K E P T I K E R S K O L A N
sbzon skriver:
Regards remote viewing, James Randi is a fraud. I have thoroughly researched the research on remote viewing. I learned a specific RV protocol called ARV (Associative Remote Viewing). Any body can take the freely offered self-study course and learn it in a day — probably less. It’s the easiest of the many RV protocols/methods to do.
I have done 3400+ ARV trials. Each trial I attempted to predict what picture I would be looking at at a specific time in the future. For example, I would predict I would be looking at a man in a sombrero at 10:20am on Tuesday.
AFTER, I did the trial/session and before the time to look at the picture the picture would be randomly selected from a database of 6500 pictures. Out of 3400 trials probability of statics (read, probability of chance) simply does not allow for my nailing the target picture one in every 42 trials. Yet that’s my results. I nailed the target picture 84 times.
Self-study course at remote-viewing.com
Greg Kolodziejzyk, the founder of the site, has had similar results and so have many people that have gone through the course. He gives many examples/success they’ve achieved.
Kudos to the author of the above article. My own personal experience and research done by others screams out that James Randi is a fraud regards RV.